Which Rule response should be enabled to allow renaming of an offense?

The correct choice, which is to enable the "Dispatch New Event" rule response, is associated with allowing users to interact with an offense in a way that enhances its management capabilities, including renaming. When the "Dispatch New Event" response is enabled, it lets QRadar facilitate the tracking and updating of the offense by creating new events that contribute to its lifecycle. This response method enables the system to recognize changes made to an offense, such as renaming, and correlates it with the new events, ensuring the offense's context is preserved and accurately reflected.

The other responses, although useful for various purposes, do not directly relate to the offense management functionality required for renaming. For instance, notifying stakeholders of the offense does not provide mechanisms for altering its attributes like the name. Sending information to Local SysLog relates more to external logging rather than internal offense manipulation. Lastly, ensuring that the detected event is part of an offense is primarily focused on event association rather than the administrative functionalities needed for tasks like renaming.